I do wonder on reading this article from the NAO if they have:
1) Updated their information from that of 2007 both on the finances and the technical evolution of constructional detail?
2) Have they indeed taken into account the improvement to the World Heritage Site that by removing the A303 from sight of the monument for all to enjoy therefore improving tourism and restoring surrounding villages to a more tranquil life.
and 3) Upgrading the A303 past Stonehenge, will open up the economy to the West Country providing jobs and tourism, which will in turn help the maintenance costs they talk about - 2016 prices of the said road over 60 years.
The negativity of the report in parts, does not appear to take all this into account and do we therefore have to hope that the Chancellor has something extra in his piggy bank or Chris Grayling MP https://www.gov.uk/government/people/chris-grayling Secretary of State for Transport has a bit tucked under the mattress when the time comes to pay up!!!
on Monday | 20 | May 2019
HC 2104 |
2017-19
Report by
the Comptroller and Auditor General
Improving the A303 between
Amesbury and Berwick Down
The
full report can be accessed via the link at the top of this email
The Amesbury
and Berwick Down project – which involves building a tunnel beneath the
Stonehenge World Heritage Site – is at an early stage but there are risks and
uncertainty around it being delivered on time and achieving the benefits
government hopes it will bring, according to today’s report by the National
Audit Office.
The project
forms part of the A303 and A358 road corridor which links the South East and
South West of England. The Department for Transport (the Department) aims to
upgrade the entire A303/A358 to dual carriageway over the 14 years to 2029
through eight individual projects and allow mile a minute journey speeds along
the corridor.
The Amesbury
and Berwick Down project involves building a tunnel of 3.3km beneath the
Stonehenge World Heritage Site. The Department and Highways England expect the
tunnel to reduce congestion, support economic growth and improve the setting of
the World Heritage Site. It is forecast to cost between £1.5 billion and £2.4
billion, subject to funding approval from HM Treasury and the
outcome of commercial negotiations with contractors, with a likely cost of
around £1.9 billion (including VAT), and to open to traffic by December 2026.
The project
is only estimated to deliver £1.15 in benefits for every £1 spent, in part due
to the high cost of building a tunnel. 73% of total benefits are cultural
heritage benefits from removing much of the surface road from the World
Heritage Site. However, these benefits are based on asking the public how much
they would pay to have the road removed from the World Heritage Site and as
such are inherently uncertain.1
Highways
England believes there are significant additional benefits if all eight
projects, covering the entire road corridor, are completed and that this will
maximise its return on investment on the Amesbury to Berwick Down project. The
Department intends to approve each project on its own business case and has
committed to start two other projects alongside the Amesbury to Berwick Down
project by March 2020. However, it considers the remaining five projects to be
low to poor value for money. Highways England may therefore struggle to justify
future investment if they are assessed on an individual basis. If it does not
upgrade the whole corridor, it will not be able to help unlock the full growth
potential in the South West.
The Amesbury
to Berwick Down project has been delayed because of decisions about how it will
be funded. It was initially going to be publicly financed, but in October 2016
HM Treasury instructed the Department to use private finance, delaying the
planned start of construction from March 2020 to December 2021. In October
2018, the Chancellor of the Exchequer cancelled future private finance deals,
which included the Amesbury to Berwick Down project. At February 2019, Highways
England had spent £53 million on the project. HM Treasury has granted it a
further £21.5 million of funding for pre-construction works. The government
says it remains committed to the project, but it is not clear how the project will
be funded.
There are
risks that Highways England and the Department will need to manage to ensure
the project has a realistic chance of delivering value to taxpayers. Highways
England is still working to an open date of December 2026 despite delays to the
project, resulting in a very tight construction timetable. There are also
geological and archaeological risks.2 While Highways England is
working to lessen these risks, it also needs to make sure it can support the
project throughout its life; the operation, maintenance and renewal costs are
expected to be £524 million (2016 prices) over 60 years.
Previous
attempts to construct a tunnel have been cancelled due to escalating costs and
disagreements between stakeholders. Highways England has managed to gain
agreement in principle from key stakeholders such as the National Trust and
Historic England but other bodies, including the UNESCO World Heritage
Committee, have raised concerns.
The NAO
recommends that Highways England and the Department keep in view the open to
traffic date of December 2026 to ensure it remains realistic. They should also
engage effectively with other government departments and stakeholders to ensure
all the expected benefits of the project are delivered.
Amyas
Morse, the head of the NAO, said today:
- ENDS -
Key facts
£1.5 to £2.4bn
estimated
cost range
(2016 prices) to build Amesbury to Berwick Down
project (including a tunnel under Stonehenge)
|
£524m
estimated maintenance
costs (2016 prices) of Amesbury to Berwick Down project over 60 years
|
3.3km
current length of
proposed tunnel under Stonehenge
|
73%
|
the cultural heritage
benefits as a percentage of total monetised project benefits |
1.15:1 |
latest
benefit-cost ratio for Amesbury to Berwick Down project
|
December
2026 |
estimated date for the
Amesbury to Berwick down project to be open to traffic |
8 |
number of projects needed to
complete the A303/A358 road corridor works |
2029 |
intended completion date for
all eight projects along the A303/A358 road corridor |
Notes for Editors
1.
Highways England estimated the value
of heritage benefits by asking respondents in a survey how much they would be
willing to pay to remove the road from the World Heritage Site. While it
followed HM Treasury guidance in arriving at this estimate, these benefits are
uncertain because they are based on a hypothetical situation and are difficult
to measure. The Department questioned whether people might have responded with
a higher value than they would have done in a real-life decision-making
scenario and advised decision makers to treat them cautiously.
2.
Highways England has undertaken
archaeological surveys to avoid disturbing archaeological sites. However, there
remains a risk that unidentified sites may be discovered during construction,
which may cause delays and increase costs. In 2007, the government cancelled
the planned tunnel project at Stonehenge because of unforeseen difficulties in
the construction work. These included the presence of phosphatic chalk, which
can be difficult to drill through and dispose of, which increased expected
costs. Highways England has undertaken preliminary ground investigations, but
it remains possible that there are further phosphatic chalk deposits or
unstable cavities, which are unlikely to be identified before construction
begins. See paragraph 3.11
3.
Press notices and reports are
available from the date of publication on the. Hard copies can be obtained by
using the relevant links on our website.
4.
The National Audit Office
scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government.
The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an
Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 785
people. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and
many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and
report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used
their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies
evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our
recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public
services. Our work led to audited savings of £741 million in 2017.
Press
Notice 29/19
All enquiries to the NAO press office:
020 7798 7348 / 07940 311 694
pressoffice@nao.org.uk / 020 7798 7400
No comments:
Post a Comment